Indicator 1 Percent of youth with IEPs graduating from high school with a regular diploma.
| FFY | Measurable and Rigorous Target |
| 2009
(2009-2010) based on SY 2008-2009 data New Target | 63% or more |
Indicator 2
Percent of youth with IEPs dropping out of high school.
| FFY | Measurable and Rigorous Target |
| 2009
(2009-2010) based on SY 2008-2009 data New Target | 22% or less |
Indicator 3 Participation and performance of children with disabilities on statewide assessments:
Indicator 4
Rates of suspension and expulsion:
-
-
| FFY | Measurable and Rigorous Target |
| 2009
(SY 2009-2010)
based on SY 2008-2009 data | 4a: 0 LEAs will suspend/expel students with disabilities at a higher rate than students without disabilities 4b: 0% New Target |
Indicator 5
Percent of children with IEPs aged 6 through 21:
| FFY | Measurable and Rigorous Target |
| 2009
(SY 2009-2010) | A. The percentage of students with disabilities in a regular education setting will increase 1% to 57.47%.
B. The percentage of students in a self contained setting will decrease 1% to 17.98 %.
C. The percentage of students in MS who are placed in public or private separate schools, residential placements, or homebound or hospital placements will not increase. |
Indicator 7
Percent of preschool children aged 3 through 5 with IEPs who demonstrate improved:
| FFY | Measurable and Rigorous Target |
| 2009
(SY 2009-2010) | Summary Statement 1: Outcome A - 48% Outcome B – 50% Outcome C – 39%
Summary Statement 2: Outcome A – 81% Outcome B – 69% Outcome C – 77% |
Percent of parents with a child receiving special education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
2009-2010 Survey Results
| FFY | Measurable and Rigorous Target |
| 2009
(SY 2009-2010) | Increase the percentage of parents with a child receiving special education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities by 2.0 percentage points to 69.46%. |
Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
| FFY | Measurable and Rigorous Target |
| 2009
(SY 2009-2010) | SLD = 0 EmD = 0 L/S = 0 OHI = 0 AU = 0 MR = 0 |
(NOTE: Can not be less than 100%)
Percent of children who were evaluated within 60 days of receiving parental consent for initial evaluation or, if the State establishes a timeframe within which the evaluation must be conducted, within that timeframe.
| FFY | Measurable and Rigorous Target |
| 2009
(SY 2009-2010) | 100% of children with parental consent to evaluate are evaluated and eligibility determined within 60 days |
Indicator 12
(NOTE: Cannot be less than 100%)Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
| FFY | Measurable and Rigorous Target |
| 2009
(SY 2009-2010) | Mississippi will increase the number of eligible children transitioning from Part C to Part B, receiving services at age 3 to 100%. |
(NOTE: Cannot be less than 100%)Percent of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals that are annually updated and based upon an age appropriate transition assessment, transition services, including courses of study, that will reasonably enable the student to meet those postsecondary goals, and annual IEP goals related to the student’s transition services needs.
| FFY | Measurable and Rigorous Target |
| 2009
(SY 2009-2010) | 100% of youth aged 16 and above will have an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals. There also must be evidence that the student was invited to the IEP Team meeting where transition services are to be discussed and evidence that, if appropriate, a representative of any participating agency was invited to the IEP Team meeting with the prior consent of the parent or student who has reached the age of majority. |
Percent of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school, and were:
- Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.
- Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.
- Enrolled in higher education or in some other postsecondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.
| FFY | Measurable and Rigorous Target |
| 2009
(SY 2009-2010) Baseline | -
24% -
61% -
78%
|
| FFY | Measurable and Rigorous Target |
| 2009
(SY 2009-2010) | 0 |
| A. FFY | Measurable and Rigorous Target |
| Reading/Language & Mathematics AYP |
| 2009
(SY 2009-2010) | 45.0% |
| B. FFY | Measurable and Rigorous Target |
| Reading/Language Participation | Mathematics Participation |
| 2009
(SY 2009-2010) | 95% | 95% |
| C. FFY | Measurable and Rigorous Target |
| Reading/Language Proficiency | Mathematics Proficiency |
| 2009
(SY 2009-2010) | 49.3% | 51.7% |